Ultimately, the legislature and the governor essentially settled that case by agreeing to a new set of maps. So the political process took care of that one. The Supreme Court did not redraw the maps. They, in fact, did not get into any questions about whether the maps were gerrymandered or favored one party or another. They were just looking at the state constitution and applying the law, and I think they got it right. And before we do, audience questions off. Emily's question. (43:24–43:36)
CLAIM
Asserts that the Supreme Court did not redraw legislative maps or address gerrymandering.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
