But I could be wrong on that. So what happens here is that the courts reject this a bunch of times because SEQUA is about public development. And then The Supreme Court rules. No, no, no, no. Public development is anything that requires a permit by the state of California. There's a Sierra Club lobbyist who we quote in the book who says after that CEQA applies to anything where you are rubbing two sticks together in the state. (27:00–27:08)
CLAIM
Asserts that the Supreme Court ruled public development as anything requiring a permit by the state of California.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
