We didn't say you couldn't, or we said you couldn't, but we didn't mean it. And so we're watching The Supreme Court walk[s] back its precedents, completely ignore[s] the term and its term of art, stare decisis. It stands decided. And really, it's fomenting authoritarianism. Okay, and I want to flag here the fantastic conversation we had with Sky Perryman and Democracy Forward, but also the conversations we had with Liz Schuller from AFL CIO and with Becky Pringle of nea. (09:26–09:34)
CLAIM
Asserts that the Supreme Court is disregarding its own precedents.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
