… land to developers with no significant plan or, or doing nothing and just having this kind of big piece of infrastructure which could be better. And that's absolutely not it. I'm open to changing [the bridge] as long as we have the result be public housing or cooperative housing. or things which would actually benefit the public rather than it just being a handout to developers. And that's really key. I mean, we're often faced with a really bipolar choice, which doesn't need to be like that. (12:49–12:58)
CLAIM
Asserts openness to changing the bridge if it results in public or cooperative housing.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
