I thought it was going, they were going to constrain their decision to core presidential powers, things like appointing ambassadors. But what The Supreme Court did yesterday was really create a presumption and perhaps even absolute immunity that reaches the outer limits of the official acts of a president. That's what's really got me spinning yesterday and today. But in fairness, frankly, to myself and many other Supreme Court watchers who did predict in large part these decisions, Brian, I thought we could start. (17:23–17:35)
CLAIM
Asserts that the Supreme Court created a presumption of absolute immunity for presidential acts.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.