And I would say right there is that the Supreme Court is, if the president cannot be held to uphold his oath to the constitution, then what else is there? I mean, absolutely, Mark, I couldn't agree with you more. It is incredible that The Supreme Court could say something like, well, he can say whatever he wants to the DOJ. And of course, that is entitled to absolute immunity. Even if the president instructed the DOJ to basically manufacture evidence to prosecute his political opponents? Well, that's protected and absolutely immune. (1:19:03–1:19:14)
CLAIM
Asserts that the Supreme Court claims presidential communications with the DOJ are entitled to absolute immunity.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
