The first one is if you look at it analytically in scenarios, right. I think there's a good scenario that there's a bad scenario and then there's an ugly scenario. The good scenario is that we're able to de-escalate, find an off-ramp, and then strengthen Arctic security within the NATO context. A bad scenario is something which causes a rupture between Greenland and Denmark, who've obviously had a historic relationship which is forced in one way or another, the result of which we don't know. (05:48–05:57)
CLAIM
Asserts that a positive outcome involves de-escalation and strengthening Arctic security within NATO.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
