The other is incorrect reporting of a contribution by the campaign. Either way, we have to have a campaign contribution that allegedly occurred when Cohen advanced money to pay the Stormy Daniels settlement. FICA defines a contribution as a payment made, quote, for the purpose of influencing an election. The 2016 max legal contribution was $2,700. This looks bad for Trump. It's pretty easy to conclude the payment was made to influence an election by buying Daniels silence. Right? (33:14–33:20)
CLAIM
Asserts that FICA defines a contribution as a payment made to influence an election.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
