For example, when I talk about the need to get money out of politics, and we need to get money out of politics, Often we are told, well, that sounds good, but You cannot do that under the Constitution as it's interpreted by the court. You couldn't do it unless there was a constitutional amendment. And that is presented as if it was the end of the conversation. To me, that's the beginning of the conversation. (05:11–05:17)
CLAIM
Asserts that current constitutional interpretation prevents removing money from politics without an amendment.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
