To me, that looks like we need to go ahead and enact legislation that is completely contradictory to the interpretation that the Supreme Court has made. The Supreme Court has interpreted that the president has immunity. The courts are there to interpret laws that are written by the legislative branch. And so if you make it clear, then we're in a better space. That's number one. (21:50–21:55)
CLAIM
Asserts that the Supreme Court has interpreted presidential immunity.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.