That doesn't mean that it didn't happen. That that means that they did not have adequate proof or evidence to show by the preponderance of the evidence that it in fact happened. Now There's a second investigation essentially involving tampering with the investigation itself. There were two pieces that were found to be substantiated. One was the deletion of the contact card, and the second was talking with people about the investigation itself. (04:38–04:45)
CLAIM
Asserts that a second investigation involved tampering.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.