… investigation itself and the chief is the one charged with investigating other crimes, it's necessary to take action. It was substantiated that he lied and attempted to cover up. So The two things that were substantiated were, one, a contact card was deleted, and two, the chief talked about the investigation when he should not have. If he's willing to do that, would that reduce your trust in him in other ways if he had stayed on his chief? It's not as if I don't tolerate mistakes. (02:49–02:58)
CLAIM
Asserts that two specific actions were substantiated in the investigation.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.