Some people I think have over extrapolated what that's going to mean for state government. The reality is that If the House proposal becomes the law of the land, that means that state government's going to need 2 or 3 million extra dollars in 2028 and 2 or 3 million extra dollars in twenty twenty nine as the state match. that is doable. As our economy grows, we're going to have those additional revenues and we would. Asking a state like South Dakota to have some skin in the game is not outlandish. (06:30–06:42)
CLAIM
Asserts that a House proposal would require South Dakota to provide additional state funds in 2028 and 2029.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
