… sense of loyalty, hoping that we will increase the number of regular judges so they can fully retire. That is without reducing PTAB. As we've seen and as a result, The 77 [patent applications] proposed in the bipartisan legislation could in fact have to be double or triple that if we're going to deal with the end of PTAB. Given this policy of discretionary denials of PTAB and IPR changes, we must face the responsibility the agency and its fee setting authority might in fact be in question. (07:15–07:27)
CLAIM
Asserts that the number of patent applications may need to increase significantly to address PTAB changes.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
