I didn't say they're illegal. I just said were they consistent with Your interpretation of 314A? Are they consistent with that? Obviously most of these, it's too soon. It'll be years before the Article 3 courts take down some parts of patents that were with the same evidence that was not considered by the PTO. So back to the question. Do you think you would have had as broad an interpretation since you were the first to see this act and implement it? (1:31:32–1:31:44)
CLAIM
Asserts that it will take years for Article 3 courts to address certain patent issues.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.