And then later on, it came back in front of the court and the majority had changed in the court. Now, instead of 5, 2 conservative, it was 4, 3 conservative. And Justice Hagedorn changed his vote to stand with the precedent that had been decided just a few years earlier. That's a sensible decision for a justice to take when it comes to precedent that we've come to rely on this. It's decided. (17:27–17:31)
CLAIM
Asserts that Justice Hagedorn upheld a previous precedent despite a change in court majority.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
