And that ruling was upheld, I believe, by the Fifth Circuit. In fact, as you just noted, The Fifth Circuit did the opposite, affirming the district court's decision to deny CARE's motion to strike its name from the unindicted co-conspirator list. Is that right? Yes. And that ruling finding sufficient evidence of Ker's involvement in the conspiracy as the successor organization to the Islamic association for Palestine has never been reversed, is that right? (17:27–17:40)
CLAIM
Asserts that the Fifth Circuit upheld a decision against CARE regarding its status as an unindicted co-conspirator.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
