In fact, as you just noted, the Fifth Circuit did the opposite, affirming the district court's decision to deny CARE's motion to strike its name from the unindicted co conspirator list. Is that right? Yes. And That ruling finding sufficient evidence of Ker's involvement in the conspiracy as the successor organization to the Islamic association for Palestine has never been reversed. is that right? I believe that is the ruling that found that CARES inclusion on the unindicted co conspirator list was valid and not unconstitutional. I don't believe that that has ever been overturned. (17:42–17:53)
CLAIM
Asserts that the ruling on CARE's involvement in a conspiracy has not been overturned.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
