Why then wouldn't you recuse yourself to from a case involving Act 10? Thanks for that question. So Act 10 was a 50 page long bill that changed multiple different parts of the Wisconsin statutes. And The challenge that I raised back in the 2011, 2012 period was focused on a particular provision that it challenged. My understanding of the new case that's now moving through the courts is that it involves a different provision. (29:27–29:37)
CLAIM
Asserts that Susan Crawford's legal challenge to Act 10 focused on a specific provision.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
