No, no. We had talked about 10 and I said, sorry, eight is the number we landed on, not 10. I apologize. I'm thinking back to earlier discussions. We started at 10 and ended at 8, which actually matches up with their terms. which makes sense for as they go through their own judicial retention process. And that was the reason we ended up at. (30:57–31:02)
CLAIM
Asserts that the decision for an eight-year term aligns with judicial retention terms.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
.jpg)