So yeah, there was, you know, a big issue went before the Supreme Court because they saw that the legislative maps that were in practice were highly gerrymandered. There are studies done by outside groups that are nonpartisan and Our legislative maps got a grade of F as far as not fair. And so there were multiple options put forward as alternative maps. And in 2024, the beginning of 2024, there was an agreement reached with the governor and with the legislature … (03:32–03:38)
CLAIM
Asserts that nonpartisan studies graded the state's legislative maps as F for fairness.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
