It was argued in December in the Perez case, and we should have a decision by the end of the year as to whether those words in the APA are, in fact, true. Now, A federal judge did actually rule... that President Obama's executive actions as regards to deferred action... was a substantive rule and required notice and comment period, and there was none. was none. Isn't that correct? That is. Would you challenge that interpretation? Yes. Yes, I would. I think, and I think the Obama administration will be challenging that. (10:54–11:13)
CLAIM
Asserts that a federal judge ruled Obama's executive actions on deferred action required a notice and comment period.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
