And then you're going to see this case on the courthouses that's going to end up going up to the Supreme Court and it's going to have a similar result. There's nothing in the law or constitution that says that's somehow like a no go zone for immigration enforcement. It's the most sensible place to do that in many respects. And the judge said, well, if you enforce the law there, then they won't attend their immigration hearings. (42:00–42:09)
CLAIM
Asserts that no legal or constitutional provision prohibits immigration enforcement in certain areas.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
