So there's no transparency. And the other thing is, this bill is written, it is very vague, so The legislature is going to put whatever they want on [State Question 833] so the developer ends up getting a better deal. I think that it's too risky. It needs to be rewritten and bought back. Okay, so just to be clear, you'd say a no, you would vote no on that state question? (51:23–51:30)
CLAIM
Asserts that the legislature can modify State Question 833 to benefit developers.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
