We see that across the state and it prevents us from actually utilizing the lands that have been selected for development by the state of Alaska and by private landowners. So I think what we need to do is We need a big package specific to Alaska. And we've seen this with ANCSA. We saw it with Anoka. So there's no reason why we can't have another package that clarifies critical access issues and moves some of … (1:23:51–1:23:58)
CLAIM
Asserts the need for a legislative package specific to Alaska.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
