There's legitimate opportunities for AI. I'm a believer that Congress should act on some of that, but I think in the absence of Congress acting, South Dakota likely will take that next step [in AI regulation] in the absence of Congress acting. step will be taken to not only just protect children in South Dakota, but to address some of the mental illness side of things that AI is affecting. (00:09–00:18)
CLAIM
Asserts that South Dakota may independently regulate AI if Congress does not act.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
