That's a process that you all have. You're not going to see that in the President's FY27 budget. You're not going to see congressionally driven set asides. The SRF fund would be flowing as a revolving fund if it wasn't continuously rated for earmarks and set asides. I see you're the ranking member of the Appropriations Committee. Understand that. Tell me about it. And I introduced community projects a number of years. Right. (13:12–13:23)
CLAIM
Asserts that the State Revolving Fund (SRF) would function better without being used for earmarks and set asides.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
