And I, if I get this straight, we take the community finance projects, I forget that term out of the SRF. Consequently, state EPA's would have more money if we didn't direct spending out of that 100%. That's true in a very, very large way. Yeah. And I still support the SRS because frankly, I know a lot about my communities, a lot more about my communities than anybody in Washington D.C. does, and that's why I support that effort. (15:43–15:46)
CLAIM
Agrees that state EPAs would have more money if community finance projects were not funded from the SRF.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
