I know some members of the Senate have tried to conflate the two. It is clearly two different packages. The Senate proposal, which was flawed and was dead on arrival in The Senate proposal...would have required mass transit systems to utilize their current capital funding...and there would be no revenue source for the future. for the future. They would have taken money from existing projects away and importantly, they would have taken half of the Transit Trust Fund money and sent it to road and bridge repair. (03:24–03:45)
CLAIM
Asserts that the Senate proposal would have used capital funds without future revenue sources.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
