It can be a civil allegation, but you have to be given an opportunity to defend yourself. He was given that opportunity. They had thousands upon thousands of pages of evidence against him, and They came to a conclusion in a bipartisan way of the facts in that case. and they were absolutely egregious, and he shouldn't be serving. You think it's gonna set a bad precedent? Cause now you see Fetterman coming after Menendez, and you see they just censored Jamal Bowman. (38:29–38:36)
CLAIM
Asserts that the conclusion on George Santos was reached in a bipartisan manner.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.