We think that some of the folks trying to chip away at the non discrimination protection have a broader agenda than just trying to protect truly creative individuals. If you look at this particular case, it was a very contrived case, this The 303 case never really happened. There was no business making wedding invitations. There were no gay people that wanted it done. A very bizarre set of facts to make a decision on, but obviously legitimate discussion to say where is it a public accommodation which I agree should not have discrimination … (28:58–29:10)
CLAIM
Asserts that the 303 case was contrived and did not involve actual business or clients.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.