First, 16 times that they were flagged for sex trafficking was okay, the 17th time they had a problem. What my bill would do is say If you don't have a process in place to identify and take down non-consensual deepfake pornography, you lose your Section 230 immunities. and you can be sued in a court of law. And that sort of trade of liability shield in exchange for a duty of care exists in all the other sectors of our life. (20:07–20:20)
CLAIM
Asserts that platforms without processes to remove non-consensual deepfake pornography should lose Section 230 protections.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
