No, but it's not an, like 300 bucks, right? So it was $200, y'. All. $200 a ethic violation. That's how old draconians the laws in the books are. So We have to not only update our transparency laws, but we have to close the loophole for insider trading. And like, on day one. I support that 100. I'm sure Adam does too. But, like, it's. It's not your job in public service in the house of the people. (1:16:47–1:16:54)
CLAIM
Asserts the need to update transparency laws and close insider trading loopholes.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.