There are all kinds of reasons why the public interest would limit freedom of action. So the voluntariness of this doesn't particularly bother me. The constitutional question is a good one. And under the First Amendment, The state, the government may regulate speech if there is compelling governmental interest and that it is narrowly tailored. Now that's a very. That's called strict scrutiny. And the joke amongst lawyers is strict in theory, fatal in fact. But there are moments where a law will pass strict scrutiny. (26:52–27:04)
CLAIM
Asserts that the government can regulate speech if there is a compelling interest and it is narrowly tailored.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
