It has to be a contract for telling the story, expressing the experience in some way. It's designed for TV rights, movie rights, books and that sort of thing. The situation here is narrow enough that it doesn't fall within the sweep of that law, which was created before we even had crowdfunding. to be honest. It's a 1990s vintage law. Suggesting that. Ohio lawmakers tackle crowdsource funding in cases like this. What kind of constitutionality issues do you see there? (25:28–25:40)
CLAIM
Asserts that the current situation does not fall under the Son of Sam law due to its narrow scope and the law's age.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
