Has jurisdiction over, I would review it as I would think it's more restrictive than that. But that's my thought. If you go a little bit further, it says The role of a court in reviewing a claim described in subsection A may not substitute its judgment for that of the agency regarding, quote, the environmental effects of a proposed agency action. How is that procedural. I'm curious. Yeah. I mean, that gets to the crux of the seven county ruling here. Right. (02:55–03:07)
CLAIM
Asserts that courts should not substitute their judgment for agency decisions on environmental effects.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
