Do you find it interesting that the way it reads it says, notwithstanding chapter seven, so forth and so on? In reviewing a claim of whether a final agency action complies with the procedural requirements of the act, I do [view that as an attempt to limit the scope of the review to procedure as opposed to something else]. Because I do. And I'm just we're doing this for purposes. It should be limited to the procedural violations under nepa, if there is one. (02:02–02:17)
CLAIM
Asserts that the review scope is being limited to procedural aspects.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
