… it, to make sure that these decisions went to an independent body who drew fair maps. So I do support the state Supreme Court recently striking down these legislative maps. They were not constitutional. They did not contain in the legislative districts. They're supposed to contain contiguous territory. That means territory that's supposed to be touching a lot of these maps divided communities, neighborhoods. They had plops of land that didn't touch each other. (11:26–11:35)
CLAIM
Asserts that the struck-down legislative maps were unconstitutional due to non-contiguous districts.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.