She is sided with corporate polluters who dump toxic chemicals into our water instead of on the side of the people. And she fortunately was also reversed in that decision. She [opponent] has a history of being reversed by higher courts because she does not follow the law. She pursues an agenda that benefits the big corporations and the powerful special interests. I think it's quite interesting that you, that you say a lot of that because your opponent has claimed that you have referred to yourself as an activist judge. (01:34–06:28)
CLAIM
Asserts that her opponent has a history of having decisions reversed by higher courts due to not following the law.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.