And she said, you're actually not a true judge until you've been reversed. So I take with what my opponent just said is She was reversed in a case called Wisconsin Voter Alliance v. C Corp. She was not reversed on the merits. She was admonished by our state supreme court because she ignored precedent. She even said in her opinion she was ignoring precedent. That is not what a judge is supposed to do. (08:32–08:40)
CLAIM
Asserts that [Judge Lazar] was reversed in a specific case but not on the merits.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.