So I take with what my opponent just said is she was reversed in a case called Wisconsin Voter Alliance v. C Corp. She was not reversed on the merits. She was admonished by our state supreme court because she ignored precedent. She even said in her opinion she was ignoring precedent. That is not what a judge is supposed to do. She is the one who is distinctly political agenda to this court. (08:39–08:46)
CLAIM
Asserts that [Judge Lazar] was admonished for ignoring precedent.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.