Is that good, is that healthy that we keep revisiting those or is that a bad thing? Because I can see benefits of both. Yes and no. Sometimes things change that you need to take a second look at things. But generally there should be the precedents that are set should be respected in courts and the Supreme Court should avoid, if they can, overruling precedents lightly. You shouldn't do that. (25:53–25:58)
CLAIM
Asserts that changes may necessitate revisiting legal precedents.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.