I think it's critically important that we take care of needy New Yorkers across the state. I think what we are seeing, however, is that The intent of this cost shifting was not to take care of needy New Yorkers elsewhere. It was in fact to punish [New York] city. And there is no other way to describe a chasm that grew so significantly over the course of a decade and a desire to to cost shift burdens that ranged from a wide variety of services, agencies and departments. (35:37–35:44)
CLAIM
Asserts that the cost shifting was intended to punish New York City, not to help needy New Yorkers elsewhere.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.