Even as we are seeing this legislation being billed as the anti tick tock bill, that's really not about tick tock, it's about freedom of speech. Can you actually explain that? … If a person has at least 25% financial interest in a social media platform, they can be banned if deemed under the influence of a foreign adversary. … state actor that could be named as a foreign adversary. It also includes a line in the legislation that if, let's say a person has at least 25% financial interest … (1:06:41–1:06:59)
CLAIM
Asserts that individuals with 25% interest in a platform can be banned if linked to a foreign adversary.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
