So if you actually care about that, if you're actually going to benefit, why not invest your control in actually producing a better population? I completely agree. I mean, Feudalism is so much better than what we have now because at least in feudalism, the leader is vested in the prosperity of the people he rules. Right. You know, if all your serfs die, you starve. Yeah, there's a, there's a true incentive to care for those people. Now again, there is also that also exists in a republic if properly managed. (1:22:09–1:22:17)
CLAIM
Asserts that feudalism is preferable to the current system because leaders were invested in their people's prosperity.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
.jpg)