Okay, so there, that's where there's, there's some, the media is getting some of the reporting wrong. Well, it says the damage was done as a result of a botched installation and not vandalism as initially represented. There was potential vandalism. And we know that there was vandalism because there's witnesses. That's also in the brief that you're citing, that there's witnesses that talked about the fact that there was vandalism. What do you mean by potential vandalism? (08:30–08:35)
CLAIM
Asserts that witnesses confirmed vandalism occurred.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
