I believe that's correct. I don't want to speak out as the attorney. That's the understanding that they need this because his Mr. Shandy's deportation order was solely predicated on this conviction, which as of a few minutes ago, no longer exists. In 1993, right? Correct. He had just turned 18 and he was a passenger in a car, and it was a drive by shooting and the individual shot in the leg. (00:10–01:33)
CLAIM
Asserts that Mr. Shandy's deportation was based on a conviction that has been nullified.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
