Does that suggest, as it does to me, that he knew damn well what he was doing was illegal and would not be upheld in court? It does suggest that when The federal government subpoenas, donor lists, internal communications organization records implicate the First Amendment. and also Freedom association in particular? It does. And the Supreme Court made that clear in the NAACP case. (02:06–02:18)
CLAIM
Asserts that subpoenaing donor lists and internal communications implicates the First Amendment.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
