… to sign it, but rather that simply you had a White House staffer say, okay, this is our policy. Let's sign it. And if that's the case, I think there's. If the President did not direct that his signature be affixed to it, I think there's a real argument that is not a law that is not validly in the United States Code. That law is null and void. I think that. And by the way, it's not sufficient for the President at the outset to say, hey, I support this law. Okay. (44:18–44:29)
CLAIM
Asserts that a law may be invalid if the President did not direct his signature to be affixed.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
