… one of the many NPS sites with infrastructure and resources that date back more than half a century? I think that's fair. And is it also fair to say that The proposed federal actions to assets 50 years or older, ranging from demolition to rehabilitation, often require significant expertise, funding, and time to complete, given both the historic and the environmental review processes involved. I'm not an expert on those specific issues, but I have no reason to disagree with that. So, as essential as it is, the LRF funding alone is not a cure all for the deferred maintenance issue. (00:51–01:11)
CLAIM
Asserts that federal actions on assets over 50 years old require significant expertise, funding, and time.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
